Contradiction with John 18:36
Judges 16:3 depicts Samson using physical strength to resolve a conflict, while John 18:36 emphasizes Jesus' kingdom not being of this world and His refusal to fight physically.
John 18:36: Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Judges 16:3 portrays an act of retaliation and destruction by Samson, whereas Matthew 5:39 advises turning the other cheek instead of seeking vengeance.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Judges 16:3 shows Samson taking vengeance into his own hands, while Romans 12:19 advises leaving vengeance to God.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Judges 16:3 describes Samson's response with violence and destruction, contrary to 1 Peter 3:9, which teaches returning good for evil.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Matthew 26:52
Judges 16:3 highlights Samson's strength in warfare, whereas Matthew 26:52 teaches that those who live by the sword will perish by the sword.
Matthew 26:52: Thinkest thou that I cannot now pray to my Father, and he shall presently give me more than twelve legions of angels?
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in this verse may relate to the immense physical strength displayed, which seems beyond human capability. This has led some to question the literal interpretation of such acts, as they might conflict with our understanding of human physical limitations. However, these accounts are often viewed as symbolic or as part of a larger narrative tradition.
Paradox #2
The event described could be seen as scientifically inconsistent because it involves a person displaying superhuman strength by lifting and carrying a city's gates and posts over a great distance. In reality, this feat would require strength beyond human capabilities, making it physically implausible.