Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
"Thou shalt not kill." This verse commands not to kill, whereas Judges 16:30 describes Samson's act that resulted in the deaths of many, including himself.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:38-39
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil." Judges 16:30 depicts an act of vengeance, while this verse advises against retaliation.
Matthew 5:38-39: Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth:
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
"Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but rather give place unto wrath." Judges 16:30 involves vengeance, contradicting the teaching here against personal revenge.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Paradox #1
Judges 16:30 describes Samson's death as he brings down a building on himself and others. The potential contradiction here could be related to the ethical question of Samson committing an act that results in his own death along with the deaths of others, which may conflict with the broader biblical commandment against killing. However, this act is portrayed as part of God's plan, raising questions about divine will versus moral law.
Paradox #2
"Judges 16:30" could be seen as conflicting with teachings about the sanctity of life and the prohibition against murder. In this verse, an action leads to the death of many, including oneself, which can be seen as contrary to the idea that life is sacred and should be preserved. This creates a tension between the act described and broader moral teachings in the Bible about valuing and protecting life.
Paradox #3
One possible inconsistency in Judges 16:30 could be the portrayal of Samson's strength and his final act. Earlier in the story, Samson's strength is depicted as being tied to his uncut hair, yet in this verse, he demonstrates immense power after his hair has been cut and is regrowing. This could lead to questions about the true source of his power and the timeline for his hair's regrowth being sufficient to restore his strength so dramatically.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse involves the idea of a person causing a building to collapse by pushing on its pillars with human strength alone. This event, as described, contradicts the physical limitations of human strength and the structural integrity required to support a large building.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in this verse could stem from the fact that it depicts an act of destruction and loss of life, which can conflict with values of forgiveness, peace, and the sanctity of life. It raises questions about the morality of using one's strength to harm others, even in the context of seeking justice or revenge.