Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Encourages love and blessing towards enemies, contrasting with the betrayal and harm planned in Judges 16:5.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Advises against taking revenge, contradicting the vengeful plot in Judges 16:5.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:16
Prohibits bearing false witness, which contrasts with the deceit involved in Judges 16:5.
Exodus 20:16: Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29
Advises against saying, "I'll do to him as he has done to me," opposing the intent to harm Samson in Judges 16:5.
Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15
Instructs to not repay evil for evil, conflicting with the betrayal plot in Judges 16:5.
1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].
Contradiction with Luke 6:28
Directs to bless those who curse you, opposing the malicious plot in Judges 16:5.
Luke 6:28: Bless them that curse you, and pray for them which despitefully use you.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
Commands to love your neighbor and not seek revenge, in contrast to the scheme in Judges 16:5.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Paradox #1
Judges 16:5 talks about the Philistines asking Delilah to find out the secret of Samson's strength. Some might see a contradiction in how God's chosen judge, Samson, is vulnerable to manipulation and human weakness despite his divine mission and strength. However, this is more about human imperfection and moral lessons rather than a direct theological conflict. If viewed broadly, it raises questions about the interplay of divine will and human actions. Overall, these complexities can deepen the narrative rather than directly contradict theological principles.
Paradox #2
This verse involves people using deceit and manipulation for personal gain, which conflicts with moral teachings about honesty and integrity. It highlights a situation where someone is encouraged to betray trust, raising questions about the ethical implications of such actions.