Contradictions and Paradoxes in Judges 18:20

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Judges 18:20 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Judges 18:20. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to the author of the Book of Judges, the priest felt happy when he got special items for worship and went with the people. From a Christian point of view, this might show how people sometimes choose happiness by doing things that are not right.

Judges 18:20: And the priest's heart was glad, and he took the ephod, and the teraphim, and the graven image, and went in the midst of the people.

Contradiction with Exodus 20:3

This verse commands the worship of no other gods, contradicting Judges 18:20 where the priest serves idols.

Exodus 20:3: Thou shalt have no other gods before me.

Contradiction with Deuteronomy 5:8-9

These verses prohibit making or worshiping idols, contrasting Judges 18:20 where the priest agrees to serve the idols.

Deuteronomy 5:8-9: Thou shalt not make thee [any] graven image, [or] any likeness [of any thing] that [is] in heaven above, or that [is] in the earth beneath, or that [is] in the waters beneath the earth:

Contradiction with Matthew 6:24

This verse states one cannot serve two masters, contradicting Judges 18:20 where the priest readily serves false gods.

Matthew 6:24: No man can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other. Ye cannot serve God and mammon.

Contradiction with 2 Kings 17:12

Condemns idol worship which is embraced by the priest in Judges 18:20.

2 Kings 17:12: For they served idols, whereof the LORD had said unto them, Ye shall not do this thing.

Paradox #1

The theological conflict in Judges 18:20 could be related to the theme of idolatry. In the context of the Bible, worshiping idols or false gods is considered a sin against God. This verse might highlight issues of loyalty to God versus engaging in practices that go against His commandments. If a religious leader or person is easily swayed by material rewards or social advantages to support such practices, it raises questions about true faith and obedience to God.

Paradox #2

Judges 18:20 could be seen as inconsistent with the idea that religious leaders should act selflessly and with integrity. In this verse, a priest chooses personal gain and status over his duty to serve faithfully, which may conflict with teachings about moral behavior expected from spiritual leaders.

Paradox #3

The contradiction in Judges 18:20 could arise from the fact that the verse describes someone agreeing to a request that involves idolatry and theft, which contradicts the teachings against these actions elsewhere in the Bible. This can highlight the inconsistency in following religious laws and ethics.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.