Contradiction with Exodus 20:15
This verse, which is part of the Ten Commandments, states "Thou shalt not steal," contradicting the actions in Judges 18:27, where property is taken by force.
Exodus 20:15: Thou shalt not steal.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
This verse commands love for one's neighbor and not seeking revenge, contrasting the violent actions depicted in Judges 18:27.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:29
This verse advises against plotting harm against a neighbor who lives trustfully beside you, which contradicts the attack described in Judges 18:27.
Proverbs 3:29: Devise not evil against thy neighbour, seeing he dwelleth securely by thee. [Devise...: or, Practise no evil]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Jesus instructs to love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, opposing the aggressive behavior found in Judges 18:27.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:17
This verse teaches not to repay evil for evil, which contrasts with the retaliatory violence in Judges 18:27.
Romans 12:17: Recompense to no man evil for evil. Provide things honest in the sight of all men.
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
Here, it is advised not to repay evil with evil or insult with insult, but with blessing, contradicting the conduct seen in Judges 18:27.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in Judges 18:27 could involve the issues of morality and justice. This verse describes a violent action undertaken by a group that seems to succeed without immediate consequences, raising questions about the apparent lack of divine justice or moral accountability in that specific narrative. It might conflict with the broader moral teachings in the Bible about justice and righteousness.
Paradox #2
The possible contradiction or inconsistency around that verse could be related to differing accounts of certain events or locations in the Bible. In some instances, the story of the tribe of Dan and their actions appears to conflict with other biblical narratives, either in timing or in details about places and people involved. This can lead to challenges in understanding the precise historical context of the events described.