Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Judges 19:22 involves violence and hostility, while Matthew 5:44 teaches love and kindness even to enemies.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:21
Judges 19:22 depicts evil actions, whereas Romans 12:21 encourages overcoming evil with good.
Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 13:4-5
Judges 19:22 shows behavior that is contrary to the love described in 1 Corinthians 13:4-5, which is patient, kind, and not self-seeking.
1 Corinthians 13:4-5: Charity suffereth long, [and] is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, [vaunteth...: or, is not rash]
Contradiction with Philippians 4:8
While Judges 19:22 details immoral actions, Philippians 4:8 focuses on what is true, noble, right, pure, lovely, and admirable.
Philippians 4:8: Finally, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever things [are] honest, whatsoever things [are] just, whatsoever things [are] pure, whatsoever things [are] lovely, whatsoever things [are] of good report; if [there be] any virtue, and if [there be] any praise, think on these things. [honest: or, venerable]
Paradox #1
The passage in Judges 19:22 involves extreme violence and mistreatment, which can seem inconsistent with the Bible's teachings about love, justice, and compassion. It presents a moral dilemma about the actions of the people involved and can conflict with the view of a just and loving God.
Paradox #2
The main issue with Judges 19:22 is its similarity to the narrative of Sodom and Gomorrah in Genesis 19. Both stories involve a demand from townsmen to sexually abuse male visitors, leading to discussions about hospitality, morality, and justice in ancient contexts. This repetition and its troubling depiction of violence raise questions about the intentions and lessons of these parallel stories.
Paradox #3
The verse depicts a violent and immoral act, which conflicts with modern ethical and legal standards that condemn such behavior. This inconsistency arises between cultural norms from ancient times and today's human rights principles.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be the tension between the ideal of hospitality and protection of guests versus the horrific actions that follow. It shows a situation where societal norms or obligations clash with moral actions, highlighting issues of injustice and mistreatment.