Contradiction with Genesis 1:27
This verse underscores the equality and inherent dignity of both men and women, contradicting the act of offering women to be violated.
Genesis 1:27: So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.
Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
This verse speaks to treating others as you would want to be treated, contradicting the idea of offering someone to be harmed.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with Ephesians 5:25
This verse commands husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church, contradicting any act that would harm them.
Ephesians 5:25: Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it;
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes the equality of all people in Christ, countering the devaluation of women seen in offering them to violence.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:18-19
These verses describe the body as a temple of the Holy Spirit, contradicting the idea of violating someone.
1 Corinthians 6:18-19: Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.
Contradiction with Proverbs 31:10
This verse praises the virtuous woman, in contrast to regarding women as objects to be given away.
Proverbs 31:10: Who can find a virtuous woman? for her price [is] far above rubies.
Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This commandment to not murder also implies avoiding any harm to others, contrasting with offering individuals to violence.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Proverbs 22:8
This verse speaks against wrongdoing and sowing injustice, contradicting the behavior seen in Judges 19:24.
Proverbs 22:8: He that soweth iniquity shall reap vanity: and the rod of his anger shall fail. [the rod...: or, with the rod of his anger he shall be consumed]
Contradiction with Micah 6:8
This verse calls for justice, mercy, and humility, which contradicts the unethical act proposed in Judges 19:24.
Micah 6:8: He hath shewed thee, O man, what [is] good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? [walk...: Heb. humble thyself to walk]
Contradiction with James 2:8
This verse commands to love your neighbor as yourself, opposing the idea of exposing someone to harm.
James 2:8: If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself, ye do well:
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction in that verse could relate to the value and treatment of human life, especially women, as it involves offering women to be harmed instead of protecting them. This may conflict with the idea of human dignity and the protection of the vulnerable found elsewhere in the Bible.
Paradox #2
The doctrinal conflict in Judges 19:24 arises from the problematic nature of understanding morality and the treatment of individuals. The verse describes a situation where a host offers his daughter and another man's concubine to a group of men to protect his male guest. This can contradict teachings about the inherent value and dignity of every person, creating tension with Biblical principles that promote love, protection, and respect for all people. It raises questions about the role of women and ethical decision-making according to Biblical teachings.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency in Judges 19:24 might stem from the moral and ethical standards of the time compared to modern perspectives. The actions and attitudes described can conflict with contemporary values regarding human rights and the treatment of individuals, especially concerning gender and consent. This can lead to questions about the historical context of the narrative and its implications.
Paradox #4
The verse might raise ethical and contradictions rather than scientific ones. It involves actions that conflict with modern views on human rights, dignity, and the protection of individuals from harm. These are social and ethical concerns rather than scientific inconsistencies.
Paradox #5
The contradiction in Judges 19:24 arises from the act of offering a person for assault to protect another, which conflicts with the value of treating all individuals with dignity and compassion. This challenges the ethical principle of safeguarding the well-being of all people equally.