Contradiction with Matthew 7:12
This verse emphasizes doing unto others as you would have them do unto you, which contradicts the violence and lack of compassion shown in Judges 19:27.
Matthew 7:12: Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets.
Contradiction with 1 John 4:8
This verse states that God is love, which contradicts the horrific and loveless actions described in Judges 19:27.
1 John 4:8: He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.
Contradiction with Luke 6:36
This verse calls for mercy, which contradicts the merciless events portrayed in Judges 19:27.
Luke 6:36: Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
Contradiction with Romans 12:21
This verse advises not to be overcome by evil, but to overcome evil with good, contradicting the evil present in Judges 19:27.
Romans 12:21: Be not overcome of evil, but overcome evil with good.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:27
This verse encourages not withholding good when it is in your power to act, which contradicts the lack of good actions in Judges 19:27.
Proverbs 3:27: Withhold not good from them to whom it is due, when it is in the power of thine hand to do [it]. [them...: Heb. the owners thereof]
Contradiction with Colossians 3:12
This verse exhorts believers to clothe themselves with compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, and patience, which is absent in Judges 19:27.
Colossians 3:12: Put on therefore, as the elect of God, holy and beloved, bowels of mercies, kindness, humbleness of mind, meekness, longsuffering;
Contradiction with Micah 6:8
This verse requires acting justly and loving mercy, which contradicts the injustice and lack of mercy in Judges 19:27.
Micah 6:8: He hath shewed thee, O man, what [is] good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? [walk...: Heb. humble thyself to walk]
Contradiction with Galatians 5:14
This verse sums up the law as loving your neighbor as yourself, directly contradicting the neighborly love absent in Judges 19:27.
Galatians 5:14: For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Paradox #1
The verse in question is part of a deeply unsettling and violent narrative in the Book of Judges. The potential theological concern here is the issue of divine justice and morality in the Bible. This story doesn't explicitly show God intervening to stop or condemn the horrific acts, raising questions about why an all-powerful and moral deity allows such events to happen without direct response or guidance. This might seem inconsistent with other biblical teachings that emphasize justice, mercy, or divine protection.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Judges 19:27 could be related to differing cultural practices or societal norms of the time that seem inconsistent with modern values or legal systems. These might include aspects of hospitality, treatment of guests, or issues surrounding violence and justice. Another potential inconsistency could be how different versions or interpretations of the Bible handle the story, leading to conflicting lessons or moral understandings.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in this verse could be seen in how it portrays a grave act of violence against an individual, which raises questions about justice and empathy in the story. It highlights issues of human suffering and the seeming lack of immediate accountability or protection within the narrative.