Contradiction with Proverbs 25:9
This verse advises resolving matters privately rather than involving others, which can contradict seeking alliance.
Proverbs 25:9: Debate thy cause with thy neighbour [himself]; and discover not a secret to another: [a secret...: or, the secret of]
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse advises turning the other cheek, promoting non-violence, opposing the act of going to battle.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Encourages leaving vengeance to God, contradicting Judah and Simeon's proactive approach in battle.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Paradox #1
The contradiction involves the earlier statement in the Book of Joshua, where it suggests that the Israelites had already conquered the land decisively. In Judges, however, it appears that some tribes are still seeking to take possession of their territories, indicating that the conquest was not yet complete. This creates inconsistency in the timeline of events.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in Judges 1:3 could be seen in the idea of forming alliances for warfare. On one hand, it promotes unity and cooperation, but on the other hand, it involves preparing for violence and conflict, which some might see as inconsistent with messages of peace and love often emphasized in religious teachings.