Paradox #1
In Judges 1:35, it mentions that the Amorites were persistent in dwelling in Mount Heres, Aijalon, and Shaalbim, and that when the house of Joseph grew stronger, they put the Amorites to forced labor instead of driving them out completely. This situation could be seen as a contradiction or inconsistency because earlier in the Bible, God commanded the Israelites to completely drive out the inhabitants of the land He was giving them, not just subject them to forced labor. This might be viewed as the Israelites not fully obeying God's command regarding the inhabitants of the land.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Judges 1:35 arises because the verse states that the tribe of Dan was unable to drive out the Amorites completely and ended up living among them. This is inconsistent with other parts of the Bible, such as the book of Joshua, which suggests that the Israelites had already conquered much of the land and its inhabitants. This difference highlights varying accounts of the Israelites' success in taking over the Promised Land.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Judges 1:35 could be seen as the idea of not fully following through with a command. The people were supposed to drive out the inhabitants, but instead, they allowed them to stay and made them do forced labor. This could be seen as inconsistent because it involves partial obedience and exploitation, which goes against the moral expectation of fully following divine commands and treating others fairly.