Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Judges 1:7 involves physical retribution, whereas Matthew 5:44 teaches to love and pray for one's enemies, opposing retaliation.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Judges 1:7 describes personal vengeance, but Romans 12:19 instructs to leave vengeance to God, discouraging taking revenge.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Proverbs 20:22
Judges 1:7 depicts a narrative of seeking vengeance, while Proverbs 20:22 advises against avenging oneself and to wait for the Lord.
Proverbs 20:22: Say not thou, I will recompense evil; [but] wait on the LORD, and he shall save thee.
Contradiction with 1 Thessalonians 5:15
Judges 1:7 shows reciprocal harm, whereas 1 Thessalonians 5:15 admonishes against repaying evil for evil and promotes seeking good.
1 Thessalonians 5:15: See that none render evil for evil unto any [man]; but ever follow that which is good, both among yourselves, and to all [men].
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction with Judges 1:7 could be the idea of justice and retribution. The verse might seem to support the concept of "an eye for an eye" type of justice, which could seem inconsistent with the New Testament teachings of forgiveness and turning the other cheek. This can lead to conflicting interpretations about how justice should be administered according to biblical principles.
Paradox #2
Judges 1:7 may seem harsh because it describes an act of retribution and cruelty, which can appear inconsistent with other biblical teachings on mercy and forgiveness. This could create a perceived conflict with New Testament teachings where Jesus emphasizes love and forgiveness over revenge. However, interpretations can vary based on theological perspectives.
Paradox #3
This verse can be seen as a contradiction because it involves retribution and cruelty. The main concern is the clash between the act of revenge and the values of forgiveness and compassion that are also taught in the Bible. It raises questions about justice and whether responding to violence with more violence is morally justifiable, given the overall teachings of love and mercy in other parts of the scripture.