Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
While Judges 20:9 discusses plans for battle, Matthew 5:39 advises turning the other cheek in the face of aggression, promoting peace over conflict.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Isaiah 2:4
Judges 20:9 speaks of a military decision, whereas Isaiah 2:4 envisions a future where nations will not engage in war or learn war anymore.
Isaiah 2:4: And he shall judge among the nations, and shall rebuke many people: and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruninghooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more. [pruninghooks: or, scythes]
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Judges 20:9 involves taking action through battle, yet Romans 12:19 instructs leaving vengeance to God instead of seeking personal retribution.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Paradox #1
The potential moral conflict in this verse could be about communal punishment versus individual accountability. The verse describes a collective decision to address wrongdoing, which may raise questions about whether it's fair to punish or act against a group rather than focusing on individual responsibility. This can lead to a debate about justice and fairness in holding people accountable for their actions.