Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
This verse encourages loving and blessing enemies, which contrasts with the vow of the Israelites not to give their daughters to the Benjamites as it shows unforgiveness and exclusion.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Romans 12:14
This verse instructs to bless and not curse one's persecutors, contradicting the vow made by the Israelites in Judges 21:1 as it reflects a form of cursing or withholding of blessings.
Romans 12:14: Bless them which persecute you: bless, and curse not.
Contradiction with Luke 6:27
Jesus' teaching to love one’s enemies contradicts the tribal exclusion seen in Judges 21:1, where the Israelites refuse to give their daughters to the tribe of Benjamin.
Luke 6:27: But I say unto you which hear, Love your enemies, do good to them which hate you,
Contradiction with 1 Peter 3:9
This verse advises not to repay evil with evil but with a blessing, contrasting with the punitive and exclusionary action vowed by the Israelites in Judges 21:1.
1 Peter 3:9: Not rendering evil for evil, or railing for railing: but contrariwise blessing; knowing that ye are thereunto called, that ye should inherit a blessing.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:21-22
Advises feeding and giving drink to one’s enemy, promoting kindness, in contradiction to the withholding of marriage alliance with the Benjamites as seen in Judges 21:1.
Proverbs 25:21-22: If thine enemy be hungry, give him bread to eat; and if he be thirsty, give him water to drink:
Contradiction with Colossians 3:13
Teaches to forgive grievances, while Judges 21:1 reflects holding a grievance against the tribe of Benjamin by not allowing marriage links.
Colossians 3:13: Forbearing one another, and forgiving one another, if any man have a quarrel against any: even as Christ forgave you, so also [do] ye. [quarrel: or, complaint]
Paradox #1
The possible contradiction in Judges 21:1 lies in the vow taken by the Israelites not to give their daughters in marriage to the tribe of Benjamin. This seems to conflict with earlier biblical teachings about the importance of unity among the twelve tribes of Israel. Additionally, making such a vow could be seen as being in conflict with the principle of allowing God's guidance to determine relationships, rather than human decisions based on anger or retribution.
Paradox #2
The potential contradiction in Judges 21:1 could be about the Israelites making a vow not to give their daughters in marriage to the tribe of Benjamin. Later, this creates a dilemma because they also want to ensure the survival of all the tribes, including Benjamin. The inconsistency lies in their need to uphold their oath while also needing to find a solution to preserve the tribe, which leads to actions that seem morally and ethically complex.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Judges 21:1 lies in the Israelites' oath not to give their daughters to the Benjamites as wives. This created a conflict later, as they sought to preserve the tribe of Benjamin from extinction after almost wiping them out. The inconsistency arises because they had to find ways to provide wives for the Benjamites without directly breaking their oath.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in this context could be the decision of the Israelites to deny marriage between their daughters and the Benjamites, while later feeling remorseful and taking measures to ensure the survival of the Benjamite tribe. This reflects inconsistency in their commitment to their oath versus their compassion toward their fellow Israelites, leading to actions that seem contradictory.