Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
Exodus 20:13 commands "Thou shalt not kill," which contradicts the actions described in Judges 21:12 where young women are taken after a military slaughter.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:44
Jesus teaches to "love your enemies," which contradicts the hostility and forced captivity depicted in Judges 21:12.
Matthew 5:44: But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
Contradiction with Deuteronomy 24:16
States that "children shall not be put to death for the fathers," suggesting that the actions of the Benjaminites contradict the principle of personal responsibility implied in Judges 21:12.
Deuteronomy 24:16: The fathers shall not be put to death for the children, neither shall the children be put to death for the fathers: every man shall be put to death for his own sin.
Contradiction with Leviticus 19:18
Instructs to "love thy neighbor as thyself," contrasting with the violent abductions in Judges 21:12.
Leviticus 19:18: Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I [am] the LORD.
Contradiction with Galatians 5:14
"Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself" is the fulfillment of the law, conflicting with the events of coercion and violence in Judges 21:12.
Galatians 5:14: For all the law is fulfilled in one word, [even] in this; Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Paradox #1
This verse might raise ethical and moral questions about the treatment and value of women in this context. Some may see a contradiction between this narrative and other biblical teachings that promote love, compassion, and justice. The issue here is about the morality of actions that are described and how they align with broader biblical principles.
Paradox #2
The Bible verse "Judges 21:12" talks about capturing young women to provide wives for a group of people. This can be seen as contradictory to biblical teachings that emphasize love, consent, and the respect for each individual's free will in marriage. The idea of forcibly taking women as wives conflicts with modern understandings of ethical behavior and justice.
Paradox #3
One possible contradiction in Judges 21:12 is related to the morality and ethics of the situation described, which seems to conflict with other biblical teachings about compassion and justice. The actions taken by the Israelites in this passage might appear inconsistent with the broader biblical messages about protecting the vulnerable and upholding righteous behavior, leading to questions about how these actions align with other scriptural principles.
Paradox #4
The contradiction or conflict in this verse could be seen in the act of taking young women by force for marriage, which clashes with modern values of consent and autonomy. It highlights a tension between the biblical narrative and contemporary ethical standards regarding individual rights and freedoms.