Contradiction with 1 Samuel 8:19-20
Judges 2:16 mentions judges being raised by God to save the Israelites from their enemies, whereas 1 Samuel 8:19-20 shows the Israelites rejecting God's appointed judges, desiring instead a king to rule over them like other nations.
1 Samuel 8:19-20: Nevertheless the people refused to obey the voice of Samuel; and they said, Nay; but we will have a king over us;
Contradiction with Hosea 13:10-11
Judges 2:16 highlights God's provision through judges, while Hosea 13:10-11 implies a negative view on the lack of kingly leadership despite the judges, highlighting God's disapproval when they requested a king.
Hosea 13:10-11: I will be thy king: where [is any other] that may save thee in all thy cities? and thy judges of whom thou saidst, Give me a king and princes? [I will...: rather, Where is thy king?]
Paradox #1
The contradiction or conflict in Judges 2:16 might stem from the recurring cycle of the Israelites turning away from God, facing consequences, and then being saved by judges sent by God. Some might see a contradiction in the idea of God repeatedly rescuing the Israelites despite their continuous disobedience, which could seem inconsistent with the concept of justice. Why would God keep sending help if the people keep rebelling? This may create tension between notions of justice and mercy.