Contradiction with Exodus 4:10
Judges 3:15 mentions Ehud being chosen as a deliverer despite having a perceived weakness (being left-handed), whereas Exodus 4:10 describes Moses being hesitant to lead due to a speech impediment, which is initially considered a disqualification.
Exodus 4:10: And Moses said unto the LORD, O my Lord, I [am] not eloquent, neither heretofore, nor since thou hast spoken unto thy servant: but I [am] slow of speech, and of a slow tongue. [eloquent: Heb. a man of words] [heretofore: Heb. since yesterday, nor since the third day]
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 16:7
Judges 3:15 focuses on the deliverance through Ehud's physical trait, while 1 Samuel 16:7 emphasizes that God's choice of leaders is based on heart, not outward appearance.
1 Samuel 16:7: But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for [the LORD seeth] not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart. [outward...: Heb. eyes]
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
Judges 3:15 speaks about Ehud delivering Israel through violent means, while Romans 12:19 advises against personal vengeance, suggesting that vengeance belongs to God.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:9
Judges 3:15 highlights deliverance through violence by Ehud, yet Matthew 5:9 blesses the peacemakers, presenting a contradiction in approaches to conflict resolution.
Matthew 5:9: Blessed [are] the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God.
Contradiction with Proverbs 3:5
Judges 3:15 portrays Ehud as a cunning deliverer using his own strategy, whereas Proverbs 3:5 encourages reliance on God's understanding rather than one's own wisdom.
Proverbs 3:5: Trust in the LORD with all thine heart; and lean not unto thine own understanding.
Paradox #1
The contradiction or inconsistency in Judges 3:15 might revolve around the identity and origin of Ehud. Some scholars question the historical accuracy of the story's details, such as the description of Ehud as a left-handed man and the deliverance from Moabite oppression, due to a lack of external evidence or archaeological support confirming these specific events or characters outside biblical text. However, these concerns are often debated and unclear due to the nature of ancient historical records.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict might be seen in the use of deception and violence to achieve deliverance. Some people may see a conflict between the use of these tactics and other biblical teachings that promote honesty and peace.