Contradiction with Isaiah 41:10
Judges 6:13 expresses doubt and feeling of abandonment by God, while Isaiah 41:10 reassures believers of God's presence and help.
Isaiah 41:10: Fear thou not; for I [am] with thee: be not dismayed; for I [am] thy God: I will strengthen thee; yea, I will help thee; yea, I will uphold thee with the right hand of my righteousness.
Contradiction with Hebrews 13:5
Judges 6:13 suggests God has forsaken Gideon and his people, whereas Hebrews 13:5 promises that God will never leave nor forsake His followers.
Hebrews 13:5: [Let your] conversation [be] without covetousness; [and be] content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Contradiction with Romans 8:31
Judges 6:13 implies God is not with Israel during their suffering, but Romans 8:31 affirms that if God is for us, no one can be against us.
Romans 8:31: What shall we then say to these things? If God [be] for us, who [can be] against us?
Contradiction with Psalm 46:1
Judges 6:13 is a cry questioning God's assistance, whereas Psalm 46:1 states God is our refuge and strength, an ever-present help in trouble.
Psalm 46:1: [To the chief Musician for the sons of Korah, A Song upon Alamoth.] God [is] our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble. [for: or, of]
Paradox #1
The verse might raise questions about why God allows suffering and trouble if He is truly present and caring. People might wonder why bad things happen to them even when they believe in God's goodness and presence, suggesting a possible conflict between God's promises and people's experiences.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Judges 6:13 might relate to the Israelites questioning why they were suffering under Midianite oppression if God was with them. This seems inconsistent with previous assurances of divine support, as they believed God had helped their ancestors in the past. However, their current suffering could be seen as a contradiction to those past deliverances.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Judges 6:13 could relate to questioning why supernatural events don't occur in a consistent, observable way. Science relies on repeatable and observable phenomena, whereas the verse mentions extraordinary events as isolated incidents. This lack of repeatability and observable evidence might be seen as inconsistent with scientific methods.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction in this verse could arise from questioning why a powerful and caring God allows suffering and hardship to occur. It reflects the tension between the belief in a benevolent God and the reality of difficult life circumstances, leading to a perceived inconsistency in how divine protection and justice are experienced by people.