Contradiction with Exodus 20:13
This verse states "Thou shalt not kill," which contradicts the theme of vengeance and bloodshed in Judges 9:24.
Exodus 20:13: Thou shalt not kill.
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises against seeking personal vengeance, instructing believers to leave room for God's wrath, which contrasts with the notion of vengeance in Judges 9:24.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
Jesus teaches to resist not evil and to turn the other cheek, contrasting with the cycle of violence and retaliation in Judges 9:24.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Proverbs 24:29
This verse warns against repaying evil for evil, contradicting the vengeful actions described in Judges 9:24.
Proverbs 24:29: Say not, I will do so to him as he hath done to me: I will render to the man according to his work.
Paradox #1
The potential theological inconsistency with Judges 9:24 might be related to the idea of divine justice and retribution. This verse suggests that God intervenes to repay wrongs committed by Abimelech and the leaders of Shechem. Some might see a contradiction in how divine justice is dispensed in different parts of the Bible, as other passages emphasize forgiveness and mercy over retribution. This tension between justice and forgiveness can be seen as a conflict in understanding God's character.
Paradox #2
The moral conflict in Judges 9:24 could be seen in the theme of justice and vengeance. The verse implies that a violent act should be avenged, which raises questions about whether revenge is a justified or moral response. This might contradict teachings that emphasize forgiveness and leaving judgment to God, creating a tension between human justice and divine forgiveness.