Contradiction with Matthew 5:39
This verse encourages turning the other cheek, which aligns rather than contradicts with Lamentations 3:30.
Matthew 5:39: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.
Contradiction with Proverbs 25:26
This verse suggests standing up against the wicked, which contradicts with the idea of offering the cheek to the smiter.
Proverbs 25:26: A righteous man falling down before the wicked [is as] a troubled fountain, and a corrupt spring.
Contradiction with Exodus 21:24
This law advocates for "eye for eye," which contradicts the non-retaliation suggested in Lamentations 3:30.
Exodus 21:24: Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot,
Contradiction with Romans 12:19
This verse advises against personal vengeance similar to Lamentations 3:30, focusing on leaving vengeance to God rather than contradicting.
Romans 12:19: Dearly beloved, avenge not yourselves, but [rather] give place unto wrath: for it is written, Vengeance [is] mine; I will repay, saith the Lord.
Contradiction with Leviticus 24:20
Similar to Exodus 21:24, it promotes a system of retaliation that contradicts the non-violent response in Lamentations 3:30.
Leviticus 24:20: Breach for breach, eye for eye, tooth for tooth: as he hath caused a blemish in a man, so shall it be done to him [again].
Paradox #1
The verse suggests accepting suffering or mistreatment quietly. Theological conflict might arise when compared to verses that advocate for justice or defending oneself. This could appear inconsistent with parts of the Bible that emphasize standing up against wrongdoing.
Paradox #2
This verse suggests responding to adversity with patience and humility. The moral conflict might arise from the idea of passively accepting mistreatment, which can seem inconsistent with standing up against injustice or self-defense. Some might view this approach as encouraging submission rather than advocating for justice or protection against harm.