Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
It contradicts the dietary laws of Leviticus by stating that what enters the mouth does not defile a person, implying ceremonial consumption rules are not spiritually significant.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
The vision Peter receives nullifies the clean and unclean distinctions set in Leviticus, indicating all foods are now permissible.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, which contradicts the dietary restrictions and rules around sacred food consumption in Leviticus.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:18-19
The former regulation, including Levitical laws, is declared weak and set aside for a better hope, suggesting the old rules, such as those in Leviticus, are obsolete.
Hebrews 7:18-19: For there is verily a disannulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof.
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Leviticus 10:14 could be seen in the distinction made between what is considered holy and common. The verse allows priests and their families to eat certain offerings, setting them apart from others. This can seem inconsistent with later teachings in the Bible that emphasize equality and love for all people, suggesting a conflict between exclusivity and inclusivity.