Contradiction with Acts 10:15
This verse states, "What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common," which contradicts Leviticus 11:12 by implying that all foods are clean.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares that nothing entering a person from the outside can defile them, suggesting that the dietary restrictions in Leviticus 11:12 no longer apply.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction could be related to dietary laws. Leviticus 11:12 talks about not eating certain creatures from the water, which is part of the Old Testament dietary laws given to the Israelites. This could conflict with New Testament teachings, such as in Acts 10:15, where Peter is told that no food should be considered impure, indicating a shift away from Old Testament dietary restrictions for Christians. This could be seen as inconsistent between the Old and New Testament.
Paradox #2
Some people find a contradiction when Leviticus 11:12 is compared with modern science because it describes certain sea creatures as unclean. This classification doesn't align with today's scientific understanding of animals and their biological traits, suggesting a difference between ancient and modern perspectives on dietary practices and animal classification.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in that verse is the classification of certain sea creatures. The verse refers to creatures in water that do not have fins and scales as being detestable. Scientifically, there are many aquatic animals without fins and scales, like shellfish, that are nutritious and consumed by people around the world. The classification criteria of fins and scales do not align with modern biology's understanding of aquatic life.
Paradox #4
Leviticus 11:12 discusses dietary laws specifically related to creatures found in water. A potential contradiction could arise from this verse when considering that many people today do not follow these dietary restrictions, even within some religious groups that view the Bible as sacred. This can create an inconsistency between ancient religious laws and modern practices or beliefs about food consumption and morality.