Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
This passage shows Peter being told by a voice from heaven to eat all kinds of animals, indicating that what God has cleansed should not be called common, contradicting the dietary restrictions in Leviticus 11:2.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, stating that nothing entering a person from outside can defile them, which contradicts the dietary laws of clean and unclean animals found in Leviticus 11:2.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Paul states that nothing is unclean in itself, contradicting the notion in Leviticus 11:2 that certain animals are inherently unclean.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4
This verse says every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused if it is received with thanksgiving, which contradicts the restrictions on eating certain animals described in Leviticus 11:2.
1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
This passage advises not to let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, contradicting the strict dietary laws established in Leviticus 11:2.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
Jesus teaches that what goes into someone's mouth does not defile them, but rather what comes out of their mouth does, contradicting the dietary restrictions outlined in Leviticus 11:2.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Paradox #1
The verse in Leviticus lists dietary laws for the Israelites. A potential theological conflict arises when considering New Testament teachings, where these dietary restrictions are seen as no longer binding for Christians. For example, in Acts 10, Peter receives a vision that declares all foods clean, suggesting a shift from Old Testament laws to a new covenant under Christ. This shift might appear inconsistent to some, as it shows a change in divine commandments over time.
Paradox #2
One possible contradiction related to the dietary laws in Leviticus 11 is the differing dietary practices among various Jewish and Christian communities over time. While Leviticus outlines specific animals that are considered clean and unclean, historical records and interpretations show that not all groups have adhered strictly to these rules. Some Christian denominations, for instance, have viewed these laws as not applicable after the New Testament, leading to inconsistencies in practice compared to Jewish traditions that continue to observe them.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 11:2 talks about dietary laws, specifically which animals are considered clean or unclean to eat. One scientific inconsistency could be the classification of animals because modern biology classifies animals based on different criteria like genetics and evolutionary relationships, which might not align with the classifications mentioned in the verse.
Paradox #4
The potential contradiction or inconsistency in Leviticus 11:2 could arise from dietary laws prescribed in the Old Testament, which designate certain animals as clean or unclean. This may seem inconsistent when compared to other biblical teachings that emphasize spiritual over physical purity or when considering New Testament teachings that suggest all foods are clean. These differences can lead to conflicting interpretations on the importance of dietary rules in religious practice.