Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, which contradicts the specific dietary restrictions outlined in Leviticus 11:35.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
Peter is told to eat all kinds of animals, with God declaring them clean, opposing the unclean status certain animals have in Leviticus 11:35.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Paul states that no food is inherently unclean, contradicting the declaration of certain foods as unclean in Leviticus 11:35.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4-5
Says that everything God created is good and nothing is to be rejected, conflicting with the dietary prohibitions in Leviticus 11:35.
1 Timothy 4:4-5: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Paradox #1
The scientific conflict with Leviticus 11:35 lies in the understanding of cleanliness and disease. The verse implies that certain objects become unclean when they come into contact with specific animals. Scientifically, cleanliness is about bacteria, viruses, and sanitation, which were not understood at the time. Objects don't become unclean in the absence of disease-causing organisms, regardless of contact with certain animals. This demonstrates a mismatch between ancient and modern understandings of cleanliness and disease transmission.
Paradox #2
This verse discusses laws about cleanliness and unclean objects. The contradiction or conflict might arise when people perceive these ancient dietary and cleanliness laws as being overly strict or not relevant to modern life. Some might find it inconsistent with the broader moral themes of love and mercy, questioning why certain foods or practices would be considered impure. It's about balancing historical religious rules with contemporary ethical views.