Contradictions and Paradoxes in Leviticus 11:42

Check out Contradictions Catalog of Leviticus 11:42 for the comprehensive list of verses that contradicts Leviticus 11:42. Some key contradictions and paradoxes are described below.

According to Moses, many small animals like snakes, insects, and bugs that crawl on the ground should not be eaten because they are considered unclean. This rule helps people know which animals are good to eat and which are not.

Leviticus 11:42: Whatsoever goeth upon the belly, and whatsoever goeth upon [all] four, or whatsoever hath more feet among all creeping things that creep upon the earth, them ye shall not eat; for they [are] an abomination. [hath...: Heb. doth multiply feet]

Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19

Jesus declares all foods clean, contradicting dietary restrictions in Leviticus 11:42.

Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?

Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15

God tells Peter to kill and eat unclean animals, declaring them cleansed, contrary to Leviticus 11:42.

Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.

Contradiction with Romans 14:14

Paul states that no food is unclean in itself, opposing the notion in Leviticus 11:42.

Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]

Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4

Paul asserts that every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused, in conflict with Leviticus 11:42.

1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:

Paradox #1

Leviticus 11:42 could be seen as conflicting with the New Testament teachings that declare all foods clean. This is because Leviticus 11:42 lists certain creatures as unclean and not to be eaten, while in the New Testament, specifically in Acts 10:15 and Mark 7:18-19, it is suggested that dietary restrictions are no longer necessary for Christians. This can create a doctrinal inconsistency regarding food laws between the Old and New Testaments.

Paradox #2

The potential contradiction in this verse could be related to the classification of animals. The verse might categorize animals in a way that does not align with modern biological classification systems. For example, it may describe certain animals as unclean and group them together in a way that does not match scientific taxonomy based on anatomy or genetics.

Paradox #3

The contradiction or conflict in Leviticus 11:42 could arise from the rules about dietary restrictions, which might seem in conflict with later messages of freedom and acceptance found in the New Testament. These food laws are part of a set of laws meant for ancient Israelites that many Christians believe are no longer required to be followed. This difference in adherence could be seen as inconsistent with the unity of biblical teachings.

Disclaimer: The content provided at PolarBible.com is for educational purposes only. Readers have the full right to agree or disagree with the interpretations and conclusions presented. We take no responsibility for any actions or decisions taken based on the information shared as Polar Verses.