Contradiction with Acts 10:15
This verse states, "What God hath cleansed, that call not thou common," suggesting that all foods are clean and contradicting the dietary restrictions implied in Leviticus 11:45.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares that nothing that enters a person from outside can defile them, thereby contradicting the dietary laws of holiness in Leviticus 11:45.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Paul states, "there is nothing unclean of itself," implying that food does not affect one's holiness, opposing the implications of Leviticus 11:45.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
This verse suggests freedom from dietary laws by stating, "Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink," which contradicts the holiness code of Leviticus 11:45.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:10
Describes old ceremonial laws as "carnal ordinances, imposed on them until the time of reformation," implying a temporary status that contradicts the lasting command of holiness in Leviticus 11:45.
Hebrews 9:10: [Which stood] only in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal ordinances, imposed [on them] until the time of reformation. [ordinances: or, rites, or, ceremonies]
Paradox #1
The potential contradiction in this verse could arise from the perception of how different parts of the Bible depict God's relationship with laws and requirements for holiness. In Leviticus, there is a strong emphasis on following specific laws and rituals to be considered holy. However, other parts of the Bible, such as the New Testament, might emphasize faith and grace over strict adherence to laws. This could create an inconsistency in understanding what makes someone holy or close to God.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 11:45 talks about being holy because God is holy, relating to following dietary laws. The potential contradiction arises if one considers the New Testament teachings, where Jesus and later apostles indicate that dietary laws are not essential to faith. This creates a conflict between adhering strictly to Old Testament laws and embracing the New Testament's approach of focusing on faith and inner spirituality rather than specific rules about food.