Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, contradicting the dietary restrictions in Leviticus 11:8.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Acts 10:13-15
Peter is told in a vision not to call any food impure, contradicting the prohibitions in Leviticus 11:8.
Acts 10:13-15: And there came a voice to him, Rise, Peter; kill, and eat.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Paul states that no food is unclean in itself, challenging the dietary laws in Leviticus 11:8.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4
Paul mentions that every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused, opposing Leviticus 11:8.
1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Paradox #1
The theological inconsistency might come from different interpretations regarding the dietary laws and whether they apply to Christians today. Some Christians believe these Old Testament laws were fulfilled and set aside through Jesus' teachings, while others see them as timeless. This can lead to differing views on following these specific rules.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 11:8 talks about dietary rules, specifically what should not be eaten. A possible contradiction could arise with New Testament teachings, like in Mark 7:18-19 or Acts 10:15, where it suggests that all foods are clean. This presents a potential inconsistency between Old Testament dietary laws and the New Testament perspective on food.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 11:8 deals with dietary laws. A contradiction might arise in how these Old Testament laws are interpreted or practiced by different religious groups. For example, some Jewish communities follow these dietary laws strictly, while others may not. Similarly, many Christians believe these laws were fulfilled by the New Testament and no longer apply. This difference in interpretation and practice could lead to inconsistencies or conflicts between religious traditions regarding dietary restrictions.
Paradox #4
The potential scientific inconsistency could be related to the dietary laws in the verse, which classify certain animals as unclean. Modern nutritional science doesn't support the notion that these animals are inherently unhealthy or unclean for consumption. Instead, health impacts depend on preparation and moderation.
Paradox #5
Leviticus 11:8 discusses dietary restrictions that were part of Jewish law, specifically regarding the consumption of certain animals. The potential contradiction or inconsistency might arise when such ancient and specific dietary laws are viewed in the context of modern dietary practices and beliefs. Some people may see a conflict between following these ancient rules and contemporary understandings of nutrition, personal freedom, and cultural diversity in food choices. Additionally, for Christians, there may be tension between adhering strictly to Old Testament laws and the New Testament teachings, which some interpret as offering freedom from these specific regulations.