Contradiction with Galatians 5:6
This verse suggests that in Christ Jesus, neither circumcision nor uncircumcision has any value, contradicting the requirement of circumcision in Leviticus 12:3.
Galatians 5:6: For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision; but faith which worketh by love.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:18-19
It states that circumcision is nothing and keeping God's commandments is what matters, which contradicts the ceremonial law of circumcision in Leviticus 12:3.
1 Corinthians 7:18-19: Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
Contradiction with Acts 15:1-2
This passage describes a dispute about the necessity of circumcision for salvation, contradicting the straightforward requirement in Leviticus 12:3.
Acts 15:1-2: And certain men which came down from Judaea taught the brethren, [and said], Except ye be circumcised after the manner of Moses, ye cannot be saved.
Contradiction with Romans 2:28-29
It emphasizes the inward spiritual condition over the physical act of circumcision, contradicting the physical requirement stated in Leviticus 12:3.
Romans 2:28-29: For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly; neither [is that] circumcision, which is outward in the flesh:
Contradiction with Galatians 6:15
It states that neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, contradicting the importance placed on circumcision in Leviticus 12:3.
Galatians 6:15: For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing, nor uncircumcision, but a new creature.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 12:3 could be seen as inconsistent with the New Testament's teachings about Jesus and the law. In particular, some Christians believe that Jesus fulfilled and, in some aspects, set aside Old Testament laws, focusing instead on spiritual transformation rather than physical rituals. This can create a tension between Old Testament practices and New Testament teachings about what it means to be faithful.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or conflict related to this verse could be its relevance to cultural or religious practices over time. Specifically, early Christians debated whether to keep traditional Jewish laws, like circumcision, which is mentioned here. Some argued it was unnecessary for Christians, leading to differences between Jewish and Christian practices. This formed part of broader discussions on which Old Testament laws were still applicable.
Paradox #3
The possible contradiction with the content of the verse in question could be related to its directive on circumcision occurring on the eighth day. While this aligns with certain cultural or religious practices, scientifically, it is not strictly necessary to perform circumcision on this specific day for health reasons. Modern medicine does not dictate a specific day postpartum for circumcision based on health alone, and practices vary widely across cultures and medical guidelines.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in Leviticus 12:3 could be the requirement for circumcision, which some see as conflicting with the idea of bodily autonomy and individual freedom. This practice could be viewed as imposing irreversible physical changes on a child, contrasting with modern values that prioritize personal choice and consent.