Contradiction with Matthew 8:17
This verse speaks to Jesus healing sicknesses, while Leviticus 13:39 discusses managing a skin condition rather than healing it.
Matthew 8:17: That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by Esaias the prophet, saying, Himself took our infirmities, and bare [our] sicknesses.
Contradiction with John 9:3
This verse suggests that ailments can be for God's works, contrasting with Leviticus 13:39, which purely describes physical symptoms without deeper implications.
John 9:3: Jesus answered, Neither hath this man sinned, nor his parents: but that the works of God should be made manifest in him.
Contradiction with Acts 10:28
Peter explains that God shows no partiality, whereas Leviticus 13:39 is part of laws that differentiate types of skin conditions with ritual implications.
Acts 10:28: And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
Paul argues against judging others on law-based rituals, in contrast to Leviticus 13:39 which is about following specific ritual laws.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes unity beyond physical appearances, whereas Leviticus 13:39 categorizes based on skin difference.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.