Contradiction with Mark 7:15
This verse implies that nothing outside a person can defile them, contrasting with Leviticus 13:47, which discusses physical defilement through garments.
Mark 7:15: If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
It states that defilement comes from what proceeds out of the mouth, not external things like clothing, opposing the idea in Leviticus 13:47.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Luke 11:41
Suggests that all things are clean to those who are generous, differing from the impurity described through garments in Leviticus 13:47.
Luke 11:41: But rather give alms of such things as ye have; and, behold, all things are clean unto you. [of...: or, as you are able]
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
Proclaims that God has cleansed all things, conflicting with the description of defilement through clothing in Leviticus 13:47.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Titus 1:15
Indicates that to the pure, all things are pure, which opposes the concept of unclean garments in Leviticus 13:47.
Titus 1:15: Unto the pure all things [are] pure: but unto them that are defiled and unbelieving [is] nothing pure; but even their mind and conscience is defiled.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 13:47 deals with regulations about skin diseases on clothing. A potential historical inconsistency is the understanding and application of disease control in ancient times. People in the past interpreted and managed diseases differently based on their limited scientific knowledge. This could create a conflict with modern science, which has a more advanced understanding of diseases. The instructions in the verse may not align with today's medical and scientific practices.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 13:47 deals with diagnosing mildew or mold on clothing. The contradiction might be in understanding disease transmission. Mold and mildew are not responsible for spreading infectious diseases like human illnesses, as might have been implied. Modern science recognizes mold as a potential allergen or irritant, not an infectious agent.