Contradiction with Acts 10:15
Leviticus 13:58 speaks about cleansing garments, while Acts 10:15 states what God has cleansed should not be considered unclean, showing a shift from ceremonial law to divine decree.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Mark 7:15
Leviticus 13:58 deals with physical purity, while Mark 7:15 explains that it's not external things that defile a person but what comes from within, contrasting internal and external purity.
Mark 7:15: If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Leviticus 13:58 describes a specific law, while Matthew 5:17 emphasizes that Jesus fulfills the law, suggesting a transformation or completion rather than adherence to old practices.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:24-25
Leviticus 13:58 is a part of the law regarded as a guide, but Galatians 3:24-25 explains that faith in Christ makes us no longer under the guardianship of the law, implying a departure from strict observance of ceremonial laws.
Galatians 3:24-25: Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster [to bring us] unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Leviticus 13:58 discusses ritual cleansing, while Romans 14:14 states that nothing is unclean in itself, challenging the notion of inherent impurity in objects.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]