Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
This verse states that it is not what goes into the mouth that defiles a person, but what comes out, suggesting that external contact does not cause defilement, contrary to Leviticus 15:11's concern with ritual impurity from contact.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Mark 7:15
Similar to Matthew 15:11, this verse emphasizes that external things cannot defile a person, challenging the idea of impurity through touch as described in Leviticus 15:11.
Mark 7:15: If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
Contradiction with Acts 10:28
In this verse, Peter explains that God has shown him not to call any person common or unclean, which contrasts with the Levitical law focusing on ritual impurity.
Acts 10:28: And he said unto them, Ye know how that it is an unlawful thing for a man that is a Jew to keep company, or come unto one of another nation; but God hath shewed me that I should not call any man common or unclean.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Here, Paul asserts that nothing is unclean in itself, which contradicts the detailed laws of cleanliness and defilement, including those in Leviticus 15:11.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16-17
This passage encourages believers not to let others judge them on matters of ceremonial law, implying a departure from strict adherence to laws such as those in Leviticus 15:11.
Colossians 2:16-17: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 15:11 talks about cleanliness and rituals related to bodily discharge, which could conflict with New Testament teachings that emphasize inner purity and faith over external rituals. Some might see a contradiction between the focus on ritual purity in the Old Testament and the message of grace and internal purity in the teachings of Jesus.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 15:11 deals with cleanliness laws, which could conflict with historical practices that didn't prioritize hygiene in the same way. Societies in ancient times often had different customs and understanding of cleanliness, making these laws seem strict or impractical.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the verse's detailed focus on ritual cleanliness, which might seem harsh or outdated by modern standards, especially regarding gender and health issues. This emphasis on ritual purity may conflict with contemporary views on compassion and inclusivity toward those facing medical conditions.