Contradiction with Mark 7:15
Explains that nothing outside a person can defile them by going into them, contradicting Leviticus 15:12's concern with defiling objects and purification.
Mark 7:15: If any man have ears to hear, let him hear.
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
States that God has cleansed all things, contradicting the impurity associated with items touched by an unclean person in Leviticus 15:12.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Declares that no food is unclean, which contradicts the purity laws, such as those in Leviticus 15:12.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 8:8
Indicates that food does not bring us closer to God, which contrasts with the detailed purity laws and rituals outlined in Leviticus 15:12.
1 Corinthians 8:8: But meat commendeth us not to God: for neither, if we eat, are we the better; neither, if we eat not, are we the worse. [are we the better: or, have we the more] [are we the worse: or, have we the less]
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:13-14
Contrasts the temporary purification under the law, including regulations like Leviticus 15:12, with the eternal cleansing through Christ.
Hebrews 9:13-14: For if the blood of bulls and of goats, and the ashes of an heifer sprinkling the unclean, sanctifieth to the purifying of the flesh:
Paradox #1
The potential inconsistency with Leviticus 15:12 might be related to hygiene and disease transmission. In ancient times, the understanding of germs and how diseases spread was not as advanced. The biblical practices described might not align with modern scientific knowledge about sanitation and infection control.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 15:12 discusses rules about cleanliness and rituals. A contradiction or conflict might arise because these rules can seem outdated or overly strict compared to modern views on hygiene and morality. They might not align with today’s focus on personal freedom and the understanding that physical objects don’t carry moral impurity.