Contradiction with Genesis 1:28
This verse encourages fruitful multiplication without acknowledging the impurity associated with the emission of seed.
Genesis 1:28: And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over every living thing that moveth upon the earth. [moveth: Heb. creepeth]
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
It suggests that nothing in itself is unclean, counter to the impurity described in Leviticus.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus states that nothing entering a man can defile him, contrary to the unclean aspect of emission in Leviticus.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
It implies that what comes out of a man doesn't defile, conflicting with the defilement described in Leviticus.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
Declares that God has cleansed all things, contradicting the specific impurity laws stated in Leviticus.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 15:16 discusses ceremonial cleanliness related to bodily emissions. A contradiction might arise when comparing these Old Testament laws with New Testament teachings, where the emphasis shifts from ritual purity to matters of the heart and faith, as seen in passages like Romans 14:14 or Mark 7:18-23, which suggest that external acts or states don't defile a person spiritually. This could cause conflict for those interpreting the importance and relevance of Old Testament laws in the light of New Testament teachings about cleanliness and righteousness.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 15:16 addresses ritual cleanliness related to bodily emissions. A potential doctrinal conflict might arise when considering New Testament teachings that emphasize inner purity and faith over ritualistic practices. For example, Jesus and Paul often teach that faith and moral actions are more important than ritual compliance. This could be seen as inconsistent with the Old Testament focus on specific ceremonial laws.
Paradox #3
One historical inconsistency related to this verse can involve the differing interpretations and practices in Jewish and Christian traditions. Some might see a conflict in how ancient purity laws are applied or understood today, as modern religious communities may not strictly follow these guidelines, showing a contrast between historical practices and current beliefs.
Paradox #4
The possible contradiction in this verse could be related to the understanding of hygiene and reproductive health. The verse's guidelines might not align with modern scientific knowledge about bodily functions and their impact on health. Present-day science relies on a detailed understanding of biology, while the guidelines in the verse are based on ancient cultural or religious beliefs rather than scientific evidence.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or inconsistency could be seen in how natural bodily functions are treated as something that requires ritual purification. This might conflict with the view that natural processes should be accepted without moral or spiritual judgment, suggesting an inconsistency between religious practice and the acceptance of natural human biology.