Contradiction with Exodus 29:29-30
This verse describes the passing of holy garments from the father to the son, contrasting with Leviticus 16:23, which involves changing garments after the ritual.
Exodus 29:29-30: And the holy garments of Aaron shall be his sons' after him, to be anointed therein, and to be consecrated in them.
Contradiction with Exodus 40:12-14
Instructs permanent anointing and wearing of specific garments, whereas Leviticus 16:23 describes temporary changing of garments for specific rituals.
Exodus 40:12-14: And thou shalt bring Aaron and his sons unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, and wash them with water.
Contradiction with Numbers 18:7
Grants Aaron and his sons ongoing priestly duties in holy garments, while Leviticus 16:23 implies a temporary removal.
Numbers 18:7: Therefore thou and thy sons with thee shall keep your priest's office for every thing of the altar, and within the vail; and ye shall serve: I have given your priest's office [unto you] as a service of gift: and the stranger that cometh nigh shall be put to death.
Contradiction with Hebrews 7:23-27
Jesus as a perpetual high priest eliminates the ongoing need for changing garments and rituals, unlike Leviticus 16:23.
Hebrews 7:23-27: And they truly were many priests, because they were not suffered to continue by reason of death:
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 2:28
Indicates a perpetual wearing of an ephod by priests, contradicting the temporary change indicated in Leviticus 16:23.
1 Samuel 2:28: And did I choose him out of all the tribes of Israel [to be] my priest, to offer upon mine altar, to burn incense, to wear an ephod before me? and did I give unto the house of thy father all the offerings made by fire of the children of Israel?