Contradiction with Hebrews 10:4
This verse states that it is not possible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins, contradicting Leviticus 16:30 which implies atonement through these sacrifices.
Hebrews 10:4: For [it is] not possible that the blood of bulls and of goats should take away sins.
Contradiction with Hebrews 10:11
It mentions that sacrifices offered repeatedly can never take away sins, contrasting with Leviticus 16:30's implication of effective atonement through sacrifice.
Hebrews 10:11: And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:12
This verse suggests that redemption and atonement come through Christ's own blood, not through the sacrificial system described in Leviticus 16:30.
Hebrews 9:12: Neither by the blood of goats and calves, but by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption [for us].
Contradiction with Hebrews 9:9-10
It suggests that the sacrificial system of the old covenant (including the Day of Atonement) was insufficient to clear the conscience, differing from the notion of atonement in Leviticus 16:30.
Hebrews 9:9-10: Which [was] a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both gifts and sacrifices, that could not make him that did the service perfect, as pertaining to the conscience;
Contradiction with Micah 6:6-7
These verses question the effectiveness of burnt offerings and sacrifices, contrasting with the cleansing promised in Leviticus 16:30.
Micah 6:6-7: Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, [and] bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? [of a...: Heb. sons of a year?]
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11
God declares no delight in burnt offerings, contradicting the premise of Leviticus 16:30 that these offerings bring atonement.
Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 16:30 talks about atonement and cleansing from sins once a year. A potential conflict might arise with the New Testament's teaching that Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross provides a permanent atonement for sins. This could raise questions about the necessity of repeated atonement rituals if Jesus' sacrifice is considered once-for-all.