Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse emphasizes not judging others, which contradicts the prohibition in Leviticus 18:22 by promoting a more accepting outlook.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with John 13:34
Here, the directive to love one another might seem to contradict the exclusionary tone of Leviticus 18:22.
John 13:34: A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse promotes the idea that all are one in Christ, which challenges the exclusionary stance of Leviticus 18:22.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 14:13
This verse discourages passing judgment on others in a manner that could conflict with the prohibitive stance of Leviticus 18:22.
Romans 14:13: Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in [his] brother's way.
Contradiction with James 4:12
With only one lawgiver and judge, this verse suggests that humans should not judge, which could be seen as contradicting the rules outlined in Leviticus 18:22.
James 4:12: There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?
Paradox #1
One potential contradiction arises when considering the verse alongside ideas of love and acceptance found in other parts of the Bible, such as those in the New Testament that emphasize love and compassion for all people. Some might see a conflict between strict rules and the overarching message of love and inclusion.
Paradox #2
Some people might see a contradiction between Leviticus 18:22 and messages about love and acceptance in the New Testament, such as those found in the teachings of Jesus about loving others and not judging. This can lead to debates over whether the rules in Leviticus should be applied to all believers or understood in their historical context.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict might arise from how this verse has been interpreted and applied throughout different cultures and times. Many societies have accepted same-sex relationships, while others have used this verse to oppose them. This inconsistency can lead to debates about morality, context, and cultural changes over time.
Paradox #4
Some people see a conflict because, while the verse speaks against certain behaviors, science does not find evidence of harm caused by those behaviors. Science observes and explains natural variations in human sexuality, while the verse has a strict viewpoint. This difference can lead to conflicting perspectives between religious beliefs and scientific understanding.
Paradox #5
The contradiction or conflict with this verse can arise from the difference between its traditional interpretation and contemporary views on human rights and equality. While the verse has been historically used to prohibit certain behaviors, many people today advocate for acceptance and love towards all individuals, regardless of who they love. This can create a conflict between adhering to ancient religious texts and embracing modern values of inclusivity.