Paradox #1
Leviticus 18:23 speaks against certain behaviors that are considered immoral. A potential contradiction could arise when comparing this with New Testament teachings about love, forgiveness, and not judging others, like in passages where Jesus emphasizes compassion and understanding over strict adherence to laws. This could lead to a perceived inconsistency between the rule-based morality of the Old Testament and the grace-focused ethics of the New Testament. However, interpretations vary widely.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 18:23 forbids certain practices that some ancient cultures might have engaged in. A contradiction could arise if other historical or archaeological evidence suggests that neighboring cultures or even some within ancient Israel engaged in such practices, despite the biblical prohibition. This discrepancy might lead some to question the consistency of adherence to these rules historically.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency could arise from viewing the verse's prohibition as inconsistent with later messages of forgiveness and love found in the New Testament. The harshness of certain Old Testament laws might conflict with the New Testament's emphasis on compassion and redemption, creating a tension between strict prohibition and broader themes of mercy.