Contradiction with Matthew 9:13
Jesus emphasizes mercy over sacrifice, contrasting with the retributive justice context in Leviticus.
Matthew 9:13: But go ye and learn what [that] meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
The inclusive nature of this verse contrasts with the exclusionary punishment in Leviticus for certain behaviors.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with Romans 8:1
This verse speaks of no condemnation for those in Christ, while Leviticus 18:25 involves condemnation for defilement.
Romans 8:1: [There is] therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.
Contradiction with John 3:17
Highlights salvation and not judgment, whereas Leviticus focuses on expulsion due to defilement.
John 3:17: For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
Contradiction with Luke 6:37
Encourages forgiveness rather than judgment, unlike the punitive aspect in Leviticus.
Luke 6:37: Judge not, and ye shall not be judged: condemn not, and ye shall not be condemned: forgive, and ye shall be forgiven:
Contradiction with James 2:13
Speaks of mercy triumphing over judgment, contrasting with Leviticus's emphasis on consequences for defilement.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 18:25 might be seen as inconsistent when considering the idea of a loving and forgiving God in other parts of the Bible. Some people may find it hard to reconcile the idea of punishment or harsh consequences described in this verse with the teachings of mercy and forgiveness found in the New Testament. This perceived contradiction arises from the different contexts and messages presented in the Old and New Testaments.
Paradox #2
There are discussions about historical accuracy, such as the understanding of how populations or lands were significantly changed due to certain practices described. Archaeological evidence sometimes does not fully align with the complete de-population or transformation of lands as described, leading to questions about the literal interpretation of these events.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or conflict could arise from the idea of collective punishment, where the land is made to suffer or is "punished" due to the actions of its inhabitants. This can raise questions about the fairness of punishing land or an entire community for the actions of individuals, especially from a modern perspective where individual accountability is emphasized.