Contradiction with Romans 14:14
It suggests that nothing is unclean in itself, contradicting the prohibitions in Leviticus 18:26 about defilement.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Acts 10:15
The command that God has cleansed all things contradicts the prohibitions against certain practices in Leviticus 18:26.
Acts 10:15: And the voice [spake] unto him again the second time, What God hath cleansed, [that] call not thou common.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 6:12
Implies all things are lawful, conflicting with the specific commandments and prohibitions in Leviticus 18:26.
1 Corinthians 6:12: All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. [expedient: or, profitable]
Contradiction with Galatians 5:18
If led by the Spirit, believers are not under the law, contradicting the requirement to follow the statutes in Leviticus 18:26.
Galatians 5:18: But if ye be led of the Spirit, ye are not under the law.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:16
Advises not to let anyone judge you by dietary laws or festival regulations, contradicting the adherence to ordinances in Leviticus 18:26.
Colossians 2:16: Let no man therefore judge you in meat, or in drink, or in respect of an holyday, or of the new moon, or of the sabbath [days]: [in meat...: or, for eating and drinking] [respect: or, part]
Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:4
States that every creature of God is good and nothing is to be refused, which contradicts the selective prohibitions of Leviticus 18:26.
1 Timothy 4:4: For every creature of God [is] good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving:
Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
Declares that what goes into a mouth does not defile a person, conflicting with the impurity laws in Leviticus 18:26.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 18:26 requires adherence to certain laws, which could be seen as inconsistent with the views that some other parts of the Bible express about faith, grace, and the new covenant introduced in the New Testament. For example, the focus on specific laws might seem at odds with the message in the letters of Paul about being saved by faith rather than strict adherence to the law. This can create a tension between the Old Testament's emphasis on law-keeping and the New Testament's emphasis on faith and grace.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 18:26 emphasizes the importance of following certain laws and avoiding the practices of surrounding nations. The contradiction or conflict could arise when considering the inclusive and loving message found in other parts of the Bible, such as those advocating for love and acceptance of all individuals. The tension lies between adhering strictly to traditional laws and embracing a more universally compassionate approach.