Contradiction with Romans 3:23
Leviticus 18:29 prescribes death for certain sins, whereas Romans 3:23 suggests all have sinned and implies the possibility of redemption and forgiveness rather than immediate punishment.
Romans 3:23: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God;
Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
Leviticus 18:29 mandates judgment leading to death, while Matthew 7:1 advises against judging others.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with John 8:7
Leviticus 18:29 prescribes death for certain acts, but John 8:7 highlights Jesus advocating for mercy over judgment.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Leviticus 18:29 is about executing judgment, whereas James 2:13 emphasizes that mercy triumphs over judgment.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Ezekiel 18:21-23
Leviticus 18:29 prescribes death, yet Ezekiel 18:21-23 proposes repentance leading to life.
Ezekiel 18:21-23: But if the wicked will turn from all his sins that he hath committed, and keep all my statutes, and do that which is lawful and right, he shall surely live, he shall not die.
Contradiction with Psalm 103:10
Leviticus 18:29 lays down a strict rule of punishment, but Psalm 103:10 suggests God does not punish us as our sins deserve.
Psalm 103:10: He hath not dealt with us after our sins; nor rewarded us according to our iniquities.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 18:29 can be seen as contradicting the messages of forgiveness and mercy that are emphasized in other parts of the Bible, such as the teachings of Jesus in the New Testament, which focus on love and redemption rather than strict punishment. This can create tension between the justice-oriented parts of Old Testament law and the grace-oriented messages in the New Testament.
Paradox #2
One potential contradiction with Leviticus 18:29 is the context and the application of Old Testament laws in later biblical texts. While Leviticus prescribes severe punishments for certain behaviors, including breaking its decrees, later parts of the Bible, particularly the New Testament, emphasize forgiveness and grace rather than strict adherence to Old Testament law. This shift can be seen as inconsistent with earlier mandates, leading to different interpretations on how such laws should be applied by believers.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 18:29 discusses severe consequences for certain actions considered wrong in the context of ancient laws. A possible contradiction could be that the harsh penalties described may seem inconsistent with the broader themes of forgiveness and mercy found elsewhere in religious teachings. This can create tension between justice and compassion.