Contradiction with Matthew 5:17
Jesus states that he came to fulfill the law, which raises questions about the continued relevance of Levitical laws.
Matthew 5:17: Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Contradiction with Romans 7:6
Paul asserts that Christians are released from the law, suggesting that Old Testament laws, including those in Leviticus, are no longer binding.
Romans 7:6: But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not [in] the oldness of the letter. [that being...: or, being dead to that]
Contradiction with Galatians 3:23-25
Paul explains that the law was a guardian until Christ came, indicating a shift away from following Levitical laws explicitly.
Galatians 3:23-25: But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
Contradiction with Hebrews 8:13
By calling the covenant new, the author declares the first one obsolete, implying a transition from adherence to Old Testament laws.
Hebrews 8:13: In that he saith, A new [covenant], he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old [is] ready to vanish away.
Contradiction with Colossians 2:14
Paul writes that the written code was canceled, questioning the necessity of following Levitical commandments post-Christ.
Colossians 2:14: Blotting out the handwriting of ordinances that was against us, which was contrary to us, and took it out of the way, nailing it to his cross;