Contradiction with Luke 6:31
This verse advocates doing to others as you would have them do to you, indicating that fair compensation should be provided.
Luke 6:31: And as ye would that men should do to you, do ye also to them likewise.
Contradiction with James 5:4
This verse actually supports Leviticus 19:13 by condemning withholding wages, not a contradiction but a reinforcement.
James 5:4: Behold, the hire of the labourers who have reaped down your fields, which is of you kept back by fraud, crieth: and the cries of them which have reaped are entered into the ears of the Lord of sabaoth. [sabaoth: Heb. hosts]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 19:13 talks about not oppressing or robbing your neighbor, and ensuring timely payment to workers. A potential theological conflict might arise when comparing this directive with situations in the Bible where God's people engage in warfare or conquest, which could be seen as acts of taking from others. Some might see a contradiction between promoting just and fair treatment and stories where conquest and taking land are depicted. However, these are often reconciled within broader theological interpretations that consider historical context and divine command.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 19:13 advises against defrauding or robbing your neighbor and mentions not holding back wages overnight. One potential doctrinal inconsistency might arise when compared to parables or teachings where laborers or servants are treated differently or payment is handled in unexpected ways, such as in some New Testament parables. Discrepancies might seem to exist when balancing strict legal adherence in Levitical law with the more narrative-driven teachings of Jesus. However, these are often resolved within broader theological contexts.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 19:13 could be seen as having a moral conflict if someone interprets it as opposing certain modern labor practices, such as withholding wages or delaying payment to employees. If a society or individual justifies such practices despite this guidance, it might demonstrate a contradiction between the ethical standard set in the verse and the actions or systems in place.