Contradiction with Matthew 15:11
This verse suggests that what comes out of a man's mouth defiles him, rather than what he eats, which contradicts the restrictions placed on consuming the produce mentioned in Leviticus 19:25.
Matthew 15:11: Not that which goeth into the mouth defileth a man; but that which cometh out of the mouth, this defileth a man.
Contradiction with Romans 14:14
Here, it is stated that nothing is unclean of itself, contradicting the idea in Leviticus 19:25 that certain produce must not be eaten for a set period.
Romans 14:14: I know, and am persuaded by the Lord Jesus, that [there is] nothing unclean of itself: but to him that esteemeth any thing to be unclean, to him [it is] unclean. [unclean: Gr. common]
Contradiction with Mark 7:18-19
Jesus declares all foods clean, which contradicts the restrictions on consuming fruit in its early years as prescribed in Leviticus 19:25.
Mark 7:18-19: Because it entereth not into his heart, but into the belly, and goeth out into the draught, purging all meats?
Paradox #1
Leviticus 19:25 discusses agricultural practices and the use of fruit from trees. A historical inconsistency could arise if one considers the timing and methods of agriculture in ancient times compared to modern understanding. Ancient agricultural laws might not align with current horticultural science or practices, leading to potential conflicts in interpretation or application today.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 19:25 focuses on agricultural practices and religious offerings, which might seem inconsistent when compared to other teachings about showing kindness and caring for others. The contradiction could be seen in emphasizing strict ritual practices while other parts of religious teachings prioritize compassion over rituals.