Contradiction with Exodus 16:19-20
This passage describes how manna could not be kept until morning, contrasting with Leviticus 19:6 where sacrifices could be eaten the next day.
Exodus 16:19-20: And Moses said, Let no man leave of it till the morning.
Contradiction with Matthew 6:34
Advises not to worry about tomorrow, while Leviticus 19:6 allows considerations for the following day in relation to consuming sacrifices.
Matthew 6:34: Take therefore no thought for the morrow: for the morrow shall take thought for the things of itself. Sufficient unto the day [is] the evil thereof.
Contradiction with 1 Samuel 21:6
In this passage, David eats consecrated bread, indicating exceptions to priestly rules, whereas Leviticus 19:6 strictly defines the timeframe for consuming offerings.
1 Samuel 21:6: So the priest gave him hallowed [bread]: for there was no bread there but the shewbread, that was taken from before the LORD, to put hot bread in the day when it was taken away.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11
Questions the value of sacrifices in general, in contrast to the detailed sacrificial instructions like those in Leviticus 19:6.
Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]
Paradox #1
The contradiction in Leviticus 19:6 could be that it prescribes specific instructions on how to handle leftover sacrificial meat, which may seem overly strict or unnecessary to modern readers. Some might see this as inconsistent with the freedom from ritual laws emphasized in other parts of the Bible, particularly in the New Testament, where such detailed laws are often viewed as no longer required.