Contradiction with Psalm 51:16
This verse states that God does not delight in burnt offerings, which contradicts Leviticus 1:9 that describes the burnt offering as a pleasing aroma to the Lord.
Psalm 51:16: For thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give [it]: thou delightest not in burnt offering. [else...: or, that I should]
Contradiction with Hosea 6:6
This verse emphasizes that God desires mercy, not sacrifice, contrasting with the commandment in Leviticus 1:9 to offer a burnt offering.
Hosea 6:6: For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.
Contradiction with Isaiah 1:11
This verse questions the value of burnt offerings and suggests they are not desired by God, contradicting the idea that such offerings are pleasing as in Leviticus 1:9.
Isaiah 1:11: To what purpose [is] the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the LORD: I am full of the burnt offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he goats. [he goats: Heb. great he goats]
Contradiction with Amos 5:22
This verse states that God will not accept the burnt offerings, contrary to Leviticus 1:9 which describes them as a sweet savor unto the Lord.
Amos 5:22: Though ye offer me burnt offerings and your meat offerings, I will not accept [them]: neither will I regard the peace offerings of your fat beasts. [peace...: or, thank offerings]
Contradiction with Micah 6:6-8
This passage emphasizes justice, kindness, and humility over burnt offerings, which stands in contrast to the ritualistic focus in Leviticus 1:9.
Micah 6:6-8: Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, [and] bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old? [of a...: Heb. sons of a year?]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 1:9 talks about burnt offerings, and a contradiction might arise when comparing the practice of animal sacrifices to other ancient cultures' rituals or to biblical texts that denounce animal sacrifices. Some parts of the Bible emphasize obedience and a contrite heart over ritual sacrifices, which could be seen as inconsistent with Leviticus's detailed sacrificial instructions.
Paradox #2
The contradiction in Leviticus 1:9 could be related to the practice of animal sacrifice. In modern science, particularly in biology and ecology, unnecessary animal killing is often discouraged due to ethical concerns and the understanding of ecosystems. Additionally, burning animal parts is not seen as a method that has any physical benefit or scientific basis, whereas in ancient times it was considered a divine ritual.
Paradox #3
Leviticus 1:9 talks about burnt offerings to God, which might seem contradictory because it involves the killing of animals, despite the Bible elsewhere teaching kindness and care for living creatures. This could be seen as conflicting moral teachings about treatment of animals.