Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse suggests showing mercy rather than carrying out the death penalty, contrasting with the strict punishment in Leviticus 20:12.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Matthew 5:7
Encourages mercy, which opposes the strict punishment laid out in Leviticus 20:12.
Matthew 5:7: Blessed [are] the merciful: for they shall obtain mercy.
Contradiction with Luke 6:36
Calls for being merciful, which contradicts the death penalty prescribed in Leviticus 20:12.
Luke 6:36: Be ye therefore merciful, as your Father also is merciful.
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
Warns against judging others, which contrasts with the punitive directive in Leviticus 20:12.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Contradiction with Galatians 6:1
Suggests restoring a person with gentleness, differing from the severe punishment in Leviticus 20:12.
Galatians 6:1: Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted. [if: or, although]
Paradox #1
Leviticus 20:12 discusses a law that calls for severe punishment for a specific action. Some people might see a conflict between this verse and messages in the New Testament that emphasize forgiveness and love, such as those taught by Jesus. This could seem inconsistent with a message of mercy and compassion.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 20:12 discusses a punishment for a specific act. The contradiction or conflict might arise from comparing this ancient law with modern values. Today, many societies consider the punishment described as too harsh or inhumane. This clash highlights how justice and moral perspectives can change over time, leading to inconsistencies with current legal and ethical standards.
Paradox #3
The contradiction or inconsistency is that the verse prescribes a specific punishment for a behavior that is a moral or legal issue rather than a scientific one. Modern scientific understanding and legal systems separate religious or moral rules from empirical evidence and the universal application of human rights.
Paradox #4
One potential contradiction with this verse is that it prescribes a severe punishment, which conflicts with modern views on justice and human rights that emphasize rehabilitation over harsh penalties. Additionally, this could conflict with messages of forgiveness and mercy found elsewhere in the Bible.