Contradiction with Matthew 7:1
This verse teaches not to judge others, which contradicts the judgment and punishment prescribed in Leviticus 20:16.
Matthew 7:1: Judge not, that ye be not judged.
Contradiction with John 8:7
This verse speaks about casting the first stone only if one is without sin, opposing the immediate punishment suggested in Leviticus 20:16.
John 8:7: So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
Contradiction with Romans 14:13
Encourages not to judge or be a stumbling block, contrasting with the judgment in Leviticus 20:16.
Romans 14:13: Let us not therefore judge one another any more: but judge this rather, that no man put a stumblingblock or an occasion to fall in [his] brother's way.
Contradiction with James 2:13
Emphasizes mercy triumphing over judgment, differing from the harsh penalty in Leviticus 20:16.
James 2:13: For he shall have judgment without mercy, that hath shewed no mercy; and mercy rejoiceth against judgment. [rejoiceth: or, glorieth]
Contradiction with Romans 2:1
Warns against judging others as it brings judgment upon oneself, in contrast to Leviticus 20:16.
Romans 2:1: Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
Paradox #1
The doctrinal conflict with Leviticus 20:16 could arise from its depiction of severe punishment, which seems to be at odds with the themes of forgiveness and mercy emphasized in other parts of the Bible, such as in the New Testament. This might create tension between upholding strict justice and offering compassion and redemption.
Paradox #2
This verse, which addresses severe consequences for certain actions, might conflict with contemporary values and laws around justice and punishment. Some people view these ancient laws as too harsh compared to modern legal systems, creating a tension between historical religious texts and current ethical standards.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in that verse involves an event that is not possible according to our understanding of biology and animal behavior. It describes a situation that does not occur in the natural world, which conflicts with scientific knowledge about animals and their interactions with humans.
Paradox #4
The contradiction could arise from the harshness of the punishment described, which may seem inconsistent with modern values of justice and compassion. Additionally, the severity might appear to conflict with the broader biblical themes of forgiveness and redemption.