Contradiction with Matthew 23:12
This verse emphasizes humility over exaltation, contradicting the high status demanded in Leviticus 21:10 for the high priest.
Matthew 23:12: And whosoever shall exalt himself shall be abased; and he that shall humble himself shall be exalted.
Contradiction with Philippians 2:3
Encourages considering others better than oneself, contrasting with the separateness and elevation of the high priest in Leviticus 21:10.
Philippians 2:3: [Let] nothing [be done] through strife or vainglory; but in lowliness of mind let each esteem other better than themselves.
Contradiction with James 2:9
Condemns favoritism, while Leviticus 21:10 sets the high priest apart as special.
James 2:9: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
Emphasizes equality among all people in Christ, conflicting with the distinct status of the high priest in Leviticus 21:10.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 21:10 discusses rules for high priests, requiring them to avoid mourning rituals. A potential contradiction arises when compared to the New Testament teachings of Jesus, which emphasize compassion and mourning with those who mourn. It could seem inconsistent with the idea that religious leaders should show empathy and solidarity in times of grief.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 21:10 could be seen as conflicting with New Testament teachings about the priesthood of all believers and the approachability of God. In the Old Testament, certain regulations were specific to high priests, but the New Testament emphasizes direct access to God for all people through Jesus. This shift can seem like a contradiction between the exclusivity of the Old Testament priesthood and the inclusivity of the New Testament.
Paradox #3
The potential contradiction in Leviticus 21:10 might relate to the idea of religious leaders being held to different standards than others, which could seem unfair. It could be seen as inconsistent to have strict rules for some but not for all, which might conflict with the idea of equality.