Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse implies equality among all people in Christ, potentially contradicting the notion of marrying only within a particular group.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:39
This verse states a widow may remarry whomever she wishes, as long as it's in the Lord, contrasting with the restriction of marrying only virgins.
1 Corinthians 7:39: The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.
Contradiction with Numbers 12:1
Moses married a Cushite woman, which might contrast with the idea of marrying only within one's own people.
Numbers 12:1: And Miriam and Aaron spake against Moses because of the Ethiopian woman whom he had married: for he had married an Ethiopian woman. [Ethiopian: or, Cushite] [married: Heb. taken]
Contradiction with Matthew 1:5
Rahab, a non-Israelite, is part of the genealogy of Jesus, demonstrating acceptance beyond one's own people.
Matthew 1:5: And Salmon begat Booz of Rachab; and Booz begat Obed of Ruth; and Obed begat Jesse;
Contradiction with Acts 10:34-35
This verse emphasizes that God accepts people from every nation, potentially conflicting with marrying exclusively within one's own lineage.
Acts 10:34-35: Then Peter opened [his] mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons:
Paradox #1
Leviticus 21:13 could be seen as inconsistent with the broader biblical message of equality and love for all people, as it sets specific marital requirements that might appear exclusive. This might conflict with more inclusive teachings elsewhere in scripture.
Paradox #2
Leviticus 21:13 could be seen as inconsistent with later teachings in the New Testament that emphasize equality and the idea that faith and character are more important than lineage or marital status. The New Testament often shifts focus away from strict rules about marriage to more inclusive and spiritual values.
Paradox #3
The contradiction in Leviticus 21:13 could relate to how it outlines specific marriage requirements for priests that don't apply to the general population, creating a potential inconsistency with broader biblical themes of fairness and equality. This distinction in standards might seem at odds with more universal moral teachings found elsewhere in religious texts.
Paradox #4
The contradiction in this verse could involve the requirement for certain religious leaders to marry only specific individuals, which may conflict with modern views on love, personal choice, and equality in marriage. This can be seen as inconsistent with the idea of fairness or equal treatment for all people.