Contradiction with 1 Timothy 4:3
This verse contradicts Leviticus 21:14 through its warning against forbidding marriage, whereas Leviticus 21:14 restricts whom the high priest can marry.
1 Timothy 4:3: Forbidding to marry, [and commanding] to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.
Contradiction with Galatians 3:28
This verse emphasizes equality in Christ, contradicting Leviticus 21:14's specific marital restrictions based on past status or identity.
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
Contradiction with 1 Corinthians 7:39
This verse permits a widow to remarry anyone she wishes in the Lord, contrasting with Leviticus 21:14's prohibition against priests marrying widows.
1 Corinthians 7:39: The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only in the Lord.
Contradiction with Romans 7:2-3
This passage supports the freedom to remarry after a spouse's death, which contrasts with the specific marital restrictions in Leviticus 21:14.
Romans 7:2-3: For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to [her] husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of [her] husband.
Paradox #1
Leviticus 21:14 might seem contradictory because it sets rules specifically for priests that could be seen as inconsistent with the overall biblical message of equality and love. Some might view these rules as unfair or exclusive, as they impose stricter guidelines for religious leaders that don't apply to others. This could be seen as conflicting with the idea that all people are equal before God.
Paradox #2
The contradiction or inconsistency with Leviticus 21:14 could arise when comparing the Old Testament laws with the New Testament teachings. In the Old Testament, specific rules were given for priests regarding whom they could marry, emphasizing purity and maintaining strict social and religious boundaries. In contrast, the New Testament emphasizes grace, forgiveness, and inclusivity, suggesting that faith and character are more important than strict adherence to laws about lineage or marriage restrictions. This shift could be seen as inconsistent with the earlier rules.
Paradox #3
The possible contradiction in this verse could be the discrimination against women based on their marital or sexual history, which conflicts with modern views on equality and fairness. It suggests a judgment on certain individuals' worthiness based on their past, which might not align with contemporary values of acceptance and non-judgment.